heart2


When a statement is true, it is not defamatory
no matter how offensive or embarrassing. . . .
The truth is always a defense to any defamation accusations . . .

Lawsuit filed in San Diego Superior Court
Case # 37.2016.00019244-CU-FR-CTL

 

 

 

 

 










 

 





Chula Vista Animal Shelter, the shelter she took Sandy to be killed
has given Cate Sacks over 800++ animals

see the list on this page:

 

shelterDogsToDreamDogs


Additionally, public records show three
other dogs met the same fate
when Cate Sacks drove them to Chula Vista Animal Care Facility
after she "adopted" them a few days earlier.
She dropped them off to be killed immediately
with rescue coordinator, Linda Septon.
Shelter Dogs To Dream Dogs, advertises itself as a dog "rescue"
and a "training" facility.
Chula Vista Animal Care Facility, and their rescue coordinator,
Linda Septon, along with Cate Sacks decided to kill these four dogs.
They did not hold any of these 4 poor homeless
dogs for the state mandated, required 72 hours. They decided together
to end their lives and toss them out the
back door of the shelter in a trash bag and a barrel.

California Hayden laws are very clear:

A shelter may not kill an owner-relinquished animal without holding the animal
for the minimum 72 hours that stray cats and dogs must be held under state law
(Food and Agricultural Code section 31754).
That is true regardless of the species of the owner-relinquished animal
and regardless of an owner’s expressed wishes that his/her animal be killed.
The Commission decided that the law does not require shelters
to take in owner-relinquished animals but does require shelters to provide
a holding period
if shelters decide to take in owner-relinquished animals.
Shelters have the choice of rejecting owner-relinquished animals
or accepting owner-relinquished animals and holding them for owner-redemption
and adoption for the same period as stray cats and dogs.
Shelters may not kill owner-relinquished animals
before the statutory holding period of 72 hours has elapsed,
with or without the owners’ permission.
(Food and Agricultural Code section 31754)
Only animals who are irremediably suffering may be humanly euthanized



 

 


 

CateFBChain
amendmentBOLD

Our Sandy was killed just a few days after this post on Facebook.
Our little S
andy was trying so hard to please her,
yet on Saturday, June 7th, the day after Cate Sacks deposited her final $ 2500 check,
she drove Sandy to the shelter, past two other shelters, 30 miles from home. Claiming he was injured and unadoptable. Sacks drove past Bonita and El Cajon shelters. Delivered him to
Chula Vista Animal Shelter, where her friend, Linda Septon works. Cate had him killed and then lied to cover it up for months afterwards. Even going as far as sending fake progress reports to us after he was dead. And telling San Diego Animal Control to keep the investigation we requested from us. And there is more, we found via public records this is the 4th dog she's done this to.
See SANDY's movies that Cate Sacks posted on Facebook before having him killed. here


 

Sandyphotodenise

"Never, never be afraid
to do what's right,
especially if the
well-being
of a person or animal
is at stake.

Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict
on our soul when we look
the other way."

MLK

Motion for Anti SLAAP filed in February 2017 by our attorney Bryan Pease.

Why? Because after having Sandy killed, Catherine Sacks decided to file a defamation suit because we shared the story of what happened to us and to Sandy the rescue dog at her place of business aka rescue.

Download